1BGDOG wrote:You probably don't own NFA items
You probably don't own items with a brace
So you probably have no understanding of this anyways LOL
But please post more memes you stole from, let me check... aww yes. Irate LOL

DaleD wrote:God I love a good cat fight.....
Clod Hopper wrote:
Clod Hopper wrote:



I have no need to advertize my possessions, regardless of what they might be, on the interwebz. I do stand in the corner of avoiding contact with the govt where ever possible, rarely does much good come from it. If I did have something that was legal at one time, but was later determined to be illegal, I am not sure I would do more than simply keep my mouth shut about it. It can go one of two ways, either .gov gets its peepee slapped with a reversal, or this is just the start of rapid disarming of citizens. If the latter one, then it is time to hold onto your weapons as they may be needed in the near future. I dunno what "getting off the porch" looks like, but it may start with simply ignoring these kind of laws. We will see.creepycrawler wrote:There have been 61 views to this thread since my last post. Some of you lurkers should chime in.![]()
I view it to diminish the bold letters on my screen indicating it has not been read.creepycrawler wrote:There have been 61 views to this thread since my last post. Some of you lurkers should chime in.![]()
same here, though i do enjoy all the memes and updates on what is going on. sadly this doesn't impact me since i lost everything in the last boating accidentRex Ashton wrote:I view it to diminish the bold letters on my screen indicating it has not been read.
I also choose to be private about things and as Clod said "not advertise" anything.
When I did chime in, it was simply because Matt was (and continues) being a <you fill in the word>
I click it to make the unread bold go away
You will notice that there has only been one person post in here bragging about what they may or may not have. I am simply a concerned citizen trying to keep others updated on whats going on.Clod Hopper wrote:I have no need to advertize my possessions, regardless of what they might be, on the interwebz. I do stand in the corner of avoiding contact with the govt where ever possible, rarely does much good come from it. If I did have something that was legal at one time, but was later determined to be illegal, I am not sure I would do more than simply keep my mouth shut about it. It can go one of two ways, either .gov gets its peepee slapped with a reversal, or this is just the start of rapid disarming of citizens. If the latter one, then it is time to hold onto your weapons as they may be needed in the near future. I dunno what "getting off the porch" looks like, but it may start with simply ignoring these kind of laws. We will see.
Props to you and your efforts. You have brought intel to the discussion. If you are so inclined, please continue.creepycrawler wrote:You will notice that there has only been one person post in here bragging about what they may or may not have. I am simply a concerned citizen trying to keep others updated on whats going on.
Clod Hopper wrote:Props to you and your efforts. You have brought intel to the discussion. If you are so inclined, please continue.
Ignore doggy's taunts.
The good ol boating accident... I remember Pirate in the early 2000's too...Rex Ashton wrote:I view it to diminish the bold letters on my screen indicating it has not been read.
I also choose to be private about things and as Clod said "not advertise" anything.
When I did chime in, it was simply because Matt was (and continues) being a <you fill in the word>
I click it to make the unread bold go away
tacotoy wrote:same here, though i do enjoy all the memes and updates on what is going on. sadly this doesn't impact me since i lost everything in the last boating accident
Gags wrote:I say some stupid sh!t here.
Im not sure i understand what you are asking. Ive not heard of having to serialize a lower. Maybe something the .gov is wanting on homemade guns or is this just a Denver and or Colorado thing?ni0h wrote:On this topic - having to get our lowers serialized - anybody got a line on this? I'm unhappy about it philosophically and financially. This sounds like since we have to go take action as ourselves with the item and associating it with a registered serial#, these guns will become fully registered - they know where to go to confisticate. I might just buy a commercially-made lower through the channel less-controlled by the sovreign ruling province of Denver-Boulder.
The newspaper implied that the bill to outlaw "ghost guns" passed and we had to either dispose of them or get them serialized. I presume serialization under this regime would entail the serial#, specification, and owner identification going into a state database. I've no issue with traceability. I'd stamp my lower with my SSN and callsign if I had the stamping punches. It's traceability in the other direction I object to.creepycrawler wrote:Im not sure i understand what you are asking. Ive not heard of having to serialize a lower. Maybe something the .gov is wanting on homemade guns or is this just a Denver and or Colorado thing?
Gags wrote:I say some stupid sh!t here.
It did pass and was signed by Polis. It is technically in effect now but included a grace period until the 1st of the year to come into compliance.ni0h wrote:The newspaper implied that the bill to outlaw "ghost guns" passed and we had to either dispose of them or get them serialized. I presume serialization under this regime would entail the serial#, specification, and owner identification going into a state database. I've no issue with traceability. I'd stamp my lower with my SSN and callsign if I had the stamping punches. It's traceability in the other direction I object to.
From the replies, though, I take it it hasn't passed all the way yet.
Thanks.BlazerZR2 wrote:It did pass and was signed by Polis. It is technically in effect now but included a grace period until the 1st of the year to come into compliance.
https://leg.colorado.gov/bills/sb23-279
Gags wrote:I say some stupid sh!t here.
I guess thats why i didnt know what you were talking about because it was a Colorado thing. I left Colorado for a few reasons not least of which was the gun laws the at the time gov chickenfawker passed and now you have your present gov poleintheassbecauseilikeit passing more of the same crap.ni0h wrote:Thanks.
So, anybody else have one of those terrifying "ghost guns" they've got to get serialized?
Indeed. He's moderated somewhat - just biding his time - but there was a strong and growing sentiment across most of the state (area, not population) toward letting AurEnvDer just go ahead and do anything it wants, in its own state. That's one thing the communists hate more than almost anything - escaping. California's trying to fine people for voting with their feet. Leaving with our land would bring next-level panic.creepycrawler wrote:I guess thats why i didnt know what you were talking about because it was a Colorado thing. I left Colorado for a few reasons not least of which was the gun laws the at the time gov chickenfawker passed and now you have your present gov poleintheassbecauseilikeit passing more of the same crap.
Gags wrote:I say some stupid sh!t here.
Sounds like the homemade lower thing in CO - except said registration isn't even free.creepycrawler wrote:The ATF says that less than 2% of the poeple who may or may not own an AR pistol complied by volunteering all of their personal information and gave up their rights as far as where they can transport said AR or wbo they can sell it to etc. Hey, at least they didnt charge you the normal $200 tax stamp!
A national gun registery is illegal. Surely there is nobody here stupid enough to fall for the "free" registration that comes with restrictions on what you can do with a gun.
I cant even imagine being that big of a dumbass...
Gags wrote:I say some stupid sh!t here.